Skip to main content

Influence of citrate buffer and flash heating in enhancing the sensitivity of ratiometric genosensing of Hepatitis C virus using plasmonic gold nanoparticles

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) based technology has been shown to possess enormous potential in the viral nucleic acid diagnosis. Despite significant advancement in this domain, the existing literature reveals the diversity in the conditions employed for hybridization and tagging of thiolated nucleic acid probes over the Au NPs. Here we employ the probe sequence derived from the Hepatitis C virus to identify the optimal hybridization and thiol-Au NP tagging conditions. In a typical polymerase chain reaction, the probes are initially subjected to flash heating at elevated temperatures to obtain efficient annealing. Motivated by this, in the current study, the hybridization between the target and the antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) has been studied at 65 °C with and without employing flash heating at temperatures from 75 to 95 °C. Besides, the efficiency of the thiolated ASO’s tagging over the Au NPs with and without citrate buffer has been explored. The study has revealed the beneficial role of flash heating at 95 °C for efficient hybridization and the presence of citrate buffer for rapid and effective thiol tagging over the Au NPs. The combinatorial effect of these conditions has been found to be advantageous in enhancing the sensitivity of ratiometric genosensing using Au NPs.

Introduction

Owing to the innate plasmonic and electronic properties, gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) gained significant attention in several biological applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In the context of biosensing, the pioneering work by Mirkin et. al., on ligating the thiol-tagged DNA to Au NPs triggered numerous opportunities [8]. Ever since, the Au NPs turned out to be revolutionary in most of the techniques such as colorimetric, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, electrochemical, spectrophotometric and piezoelectric [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In majority of these techniques, the efficient hybridization between the thiol-tagged probe and target DNA is crucial. Also, quantitative binding of the thiol-tagged probe over Au NPs is another important factor for higher efficacy of the assay [19,20,21,22].

The citrate-capped Au NPs typically possess a zeta potential in the range of − 30 ± 10 mV, signifying the negatively charged surface nature [23]. DNAs also possess similar charge on their backbone due to the negatively charged phosphate moieties [24]. Thus, when the thiol-tagged DNAs were attempted to conjugate with the surface of citrate-capped Au NPs, due to the charge-charge repulsion, the efficacy of the binding was found to be poor [25, 26].

To overcome this, salt-aging technique was developed, in which the externally added electrolyte such as NaCl minimizes the charge-charge repulsion between the citrate units as well as with the phosphate moieties of the incoming DNAs and thereby creating adequate void space for the thiolated DNA to approach the surface of Au NPs [27, 28]. However, the salt-aging process requires 24–48 h for efficient conjugation [19]. This has been overcome by strategies like tuning the pH of the Au NPs using citrate buffers, instant dehydration in butanol (INDEBT), etc. [29, 30]. Such strategies have been found to yield rapid and quantitative thiol conjugation over the Au NPs. Among these, the method that utilizes citrate buffer is highly attractive due to its simplicity and efficiency. It is generally believed that such conjugation conditions are required when more amount of DNA has to be conjugated over the Au NPs and therefore the previous studies focused with high DNA to Au NPs ratio (typically > 20). However, the necessity of citrate buffer for the cases with low DNA to Au NPs ratio has so far not been explored.

Successful hybridization between the probe and target DNA is also critical in biosensing. The degree of hybridization therefore is an important criterion to realize this. There is a vast diversity in the literature with respect to the DNA hybridization conditions. Many reports employ 37 °C as the hybridization temperature, while adapting the duration as 1–4 h [30,31,32,33,34]. On the other hand, in an attempt to realize the hybridization at a shorter time, slightly higher temperatures in the range of 55 to 65 °C are used, while the time was decreased to 20 min [35,36,37]. Few literature reports adopt a short-duration of flash heating at 95 °C, followed by hybridization at normal temperatures [38, 39]. Thus, there exists a significant diverstity in terms of the hybridization conditions.

On a different note, 185 million population is globally affected by the Hepatitis C virus (HCV), which is a blood-borne pathogen. It is known that the serological diagnosis responds typically 4 to 6 weeks post-infection due to the time required for the production of adequate amount of the antibodies. Contrarily, the molecular diagnostics is preferred, as it is highly sensitive and early-stage detection in 1 to 2 weeks post-infection is possible [36]. Since there is no licensed vaccine available till date, though efforts are undertaken by the researchers [40], the timely detection and diagnosis is imperative, since the undetected and untreated conditions could lead to hepatocellular carcinoma [41]. Therefore, in this current study, we utilized an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) derived from the core region (conserved region) of the HCV genome and subjected it to Au NPs based sensing against the viral target using optimal hybridization and citrate-mediated conjugation conditions.

Materials and methods

Materials and characterization

Trisodium citrate and HAuCl4.3H2O were procured from Sigma Aldrich, and used as received. The target (5’CGGATTCGCCGACCTCATGGGGTACATCCCGCTCGTCGGC3’), ASO (5’SH-AAAAAAAAAAGCCGACGAGCGGGATGTACCCCATGAGGTCGGCGAATCCG3’), and control (5’TTACCGATAATCCTCCGGGGCATAACGAATGCTTATAGGA3’) oligos were purchased from Eurofins Pvt Ltd. For reducing the disulfide bond of thiol-modified probe, 100 mM DTT (in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.3–8.5) was added at 1:5 ratio and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 1X) was prepared using 37 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 1.8 mM KH2PO4. The citrate buffer was prepared by dissolving 25.08 mg of trisodium citrate in 1 mL of water (100 mM) and the final pH was adjusted to 3.0 using dilute HCl.

Spectramax® iD3 was employed to follow the UV–visible spectral changes of the Au NPs based genosensing assay. The particle size analysis was performed using the Malvern Zeta sizer instrument.

Au NPs-based genosensing

The well-known Turkevich method was employed to synthesize the citrate-stabilized Au NPs [42]. The synthesized Au NPs exhibited a strong plasmonic peak at 520 nm with an average hydrodynamic diameter of ~ 20 nm. In the case of DNA sensing, the hybridization mixture comprising of 2.5 μL of the ASO and 2.5 μL of target/control in 2.5 μL of the 1X PBS buffer was taken in a PCR tube. Two conditions were employed for hybridization inside a Thermal Cycler: In one case, the hybridization was carried out at 65 °C for 20 min without any flash heating and in the remaining cases a flash heating for a short duration at a designated higher temperature (75 °C for 30 s, 85 °C for 30 s and 95 °C for 30 s/60 s/120 s) prior to hybridization at 65 °C for 20 min. To the hybridized mixture, about 50 μL of Au NPs was added and the resultant solution was subjected to stability analysis by adding 1.75 μL and 2.5 μL of 5 M NaCl solution such that the final NaCl concentration was 145 mM and 340 mM, respectively. The same procedure has also been performed with the addition of 0.75 μL of citrate buffer along with the hybridization buffer to ascertain the effect of DNA conjugation over Au NPs. After salt addition, the absorbance of the plasmonic peak at 520 nm and the ratiometric values of absorbances at 700 nm to 520 nm (A700/520) were followed.

Results and discussion

Initially, a polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) experiment was carried out using a 20 wt% gel solution to assess the effect of different temperature conditions on the hybridization efficacy between the ASO and target DNA. Figure 1a shows the gel image obtained with 3 μM concentration of ASO and target/control DNAs subjected to different hybridization conditions. Two bands corresponding to ASO and control were clearly seen in the case of control experiments that confirmed no hybridization took place between the probe and control. On the other hand, a bright thick single band in the case of target subjected to different conditions revealed efficient hybridization between the ASO and target DNA. Further quantification of the bands corresponding to the hybridized DNA using ImageJ software (Version 1.8.0_172) revealed a 7.5% higher hybridization efficacy with the sample subjected to a flash heating of 95 °C for 120 s, as opposed to the sample that was not subjected to any flash heating (Fig. 1b). These results prompted us to probe further the effect of hybridization conditions in the Au NPs based DNA sensing. For this, we chose three conditions such as no flash heating, and 30 s and 120 s flash heating at 95 °C. While one set of samples were subjected to Au NPs based sensing assay to ascertain only the effect of flash heating conditions, another set of samples were subjected to the sensing assay with the addition of citrate buffer in the hybridized mixture as it has been proven to yield rapid and quantitative thiol-conjugation over Au NPs in minutes [29].

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the probe, target and control DNA subjected to different hybridization conditions and b the corresponding percentage hybridization quantification using ImageJ software. c Schematic representation on the mechanism of the sensing strategy employed in this study

The mechanism of the Au NPs mediated sensing assay is based on the following factors. It is known that the stability of the Au NPs is imparted due to the electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged citrate moieties on the surface. The citrate-stabilized Au NPs synthesized through the Turkevich method exhibit a plasmonic peak at 520 nm and a relatively low absorbance at wavelengths greater than 650 nm in the UV–visible spectroscopy. Upon salt addition, due to the masking of electrostatic repulsion between the citrate moieties by the excess of sodium ions, the Au NPs tend to aggregate. The aggregated colloidal Au NPs are known to compromise their plasmonic absorbance and exhibit higher light scattering at longer wavelengths. It is known that the negatively charged DNA enhances the charge density (zeta potential) of the Au NPs upon binding to them. Such an enhancement in the charge density shall enhance the stability of the nanoparticles against the salt-induced aggregation of the Au NPs. Thus, the Au NPs effectively hybridized with the target DNA sequence shall possess higher stability—in comparison to the negative/control sample—and thereby retain the red color arising from the SPR.

In the case of DNA sensing, two different initial concentrations of the ASO, such as 1.5 and 3 μM were hybridized with equimolar concentration of the target/control. Also, two different conditions were employed for the thiol conjugation over the Au NPs before the salting-out process: (i) without the addition of citrate buffer and (ii) with the addition of 0.75 μL of citrate buffer. The UV–visible spectral results obtained from the DNA sensing studies are presented in Fig. 2. The absorbance of Au NPs at 520 nm as well as the ratiometric value of 700 nm/520 nm (A700/520) have been chosen to follow the effect of hybridization conditions on DNA sensing and the absorbance values before and after salting are summarized in Table 1. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the Au NPs added with target/control exhibit a high absorbance value at 520 nm (> 0.4) and a low A700/520 ratiometric value of < 0.4. After salt addition, the absorbance of the positive samples (containing target) at 520 nm gradually decreased with the addition of NaCl solution, while the A700/520 ratiometric value gradually increased. In the case of positive samples, the cut-off values of the absorbance at 520 nm and A700/520 were found to be > 0.26 and < 0.5, respectively, which indicate the stable nature of the Au NPs. Among the different hybridization conditions employed, the target-ASO hybrids subjected to flash heating were found to have a slightly higher absorbance value at 520 nm than the no-flash heating sample, though the difference was less (Table 1). On the other hand, a substantial difference was noticed in the ratiometric values of the hybrids subjected to different hybridization conditions. The ratiometric values corresponding to different hybridization conditions have been plotted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The UV–visible spectra of the Au NPs added to the oligonucleotides subjected to different hybridization conditions in terms of flash heating: a, d no flash heating, b, e 95 °C for 30 s, and c, f 95 °C for 120 s. The top and bottom row experiments were performed with 1.5 and 3.0 μM concentrations of the oligonucleotides, respectively. The respective symbols T and C represent target and control, while the experiments performed with the addition of citrate buffer were coded with (cit). The final concentrations of the NaCl were also mentioned alongside the sample code

Table 1 UV–visible absorbance data (at 520 nm and the ratiometric at 700 nm/520 nm) of Au NPs added to the oligonucleotides hybridized under different conditions before and after salting with two different final concentrations of NaCl. The data obtained are at 95% confidence level
Fig. 3
figure 3

Plot depicting the A700/520 ratiometric values of selected samples as a function of different hybridization conditions

In general, before the salting process, the absorbance of Au NPs at 520 nm was found to be in the range of 0.40 to 0.43, while the A700/520 ratiometric values were found to be in the range of 0.15 to 0.4 for all the samples. When 1.75 and 2.5 μL of NaCl was added sequentially (total amount of NaCl added was 4.25 μL) such that the final salt concentration was 145 and 340 mM, the target and control were properly discriminated, as evidenced by the high absorbance value at 520 nm and low A700/520 ratiometric value for the target. It can be seen from Table 1 that the target samples subjected to flash heating exhibited lesser ratiometric values than the ones not subjected to flash heating (highlighted in bold). These results indicate that flash heating does play a positive role in enhancing the hybridization efficacy, which results in better discrimination at the ratiometric values that are often considered to be useful in improving the sensitivity of the assay.

The experiments were then performed with the addition of citrate buffer to ascertain the effect of DNA conjugation over Au NPs and its subsequent effect on the sensitivity of the assay. It was found that the discrimination between the target and control at the ratiometric values was more pronounced when citrate buffer was used. This reveals that the use of citrate buffer is useful in enhancing the conjugation efficiency even when the DNA to Au NPs ratio is as low as 3.5:1, while the available literature reports used a ratio of 20:1 and higher [29].

Since the citrate buffer showed additional benefit in ratiometrically discriminating the samples subjected to flash heating from no-flash heating, their corresponding digital photograph, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) results are presented in Figs. 4 and 5. Although the digital photograph shows the color of the Au NPs used in different assay conditions is indistinguishable to human eyes, the DLS measurements of samples subjected to flash heating revealed a decrease in the particle size after subjecting to the salting-out process, which rationalizes their lower ratiometric values.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Digital photograph showing the color of the Au NPs in citrate buffer—added with the target samples subjected to different hybridization conditions—before and after salting-out process

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of particle aggregation measured through the dynamic light scattering analyses over Au NPs in citrate buffer before and after addition of 340 mM NaCl: a panel showing the effect of salt-induced aggregation over citrate-capped Au NPs, control sample without any flash heating, and target subjected to three different hybridization conditions. The concentration of probe, target (T), and control (C) were fixed as 3 μM. b Zoomed in data of the target samples subjected to different hybridization conditions shown in (a)

The study has revealed the beneficial role of employing a combination of flash heating for efficient hybridization and citrate buffer for rapid tagging of the thiolated DNA over the surface of Au NPs. Such a combination has been found to enhance the sensitivity of the ratiometric absorbance values in the Au NPs based gene sensing. It can be noted that the ratiometric values are highly decisive in discriminating the single nucleotide polymorphism, as described by Sanromán-Iglesias et al. using gold nanoparticles of sizes 13, 46, and 63 nm [43]. Our study reveals that employing appropriate hybridization conditions can further improve the ratiometric sensitivity of such Au NPs based assays.

Conclusions

In summary, the effect of hybridization between an ASO and target DNA was ascertained using PAGE experiment, which revealed that the hybridization involving a flash heating of 95 °C for 120 s, prior to the incubation at 65 °C for 20 min, resulted in an enhancement in the efficacy to the tune of 7.5% as opposed to the hybridization condition without the flash heating. The effect was further analyzed in the Au NPs based DNA sensing to ascertain the usefulness of the flash heating in practical applications. The DNA sensing studies using thiol-tagged synthetic oligonucleotide—derived from the core region of the HCV viral genome—revealed that the ASO-target DNA hybrid subjected to the flash heating stabilized the Au NPs more than the case without flash heating, as evidenced by the lesser ratiometric absorbance values for the former. Furthermore, the use of citrate buffer has shown to be beneficial in the efficient conjugation between the thiolated probe and the Au NPs, even when the DNA to Au NPs ratio is as low as 3.5:1 and 7:1. These results may find potential in employing the appropriate hybridization conditions in the DNA biosensing studies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

Au NPs:

Gold nanoparticles

DLS:

Dynamic light scattering

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

INDEBT:

Instant dehydration in butanol

dsDNA:

Double strand Deoxyribonucleic acid

PBS:

Phosphate buffer saline

ASO:

Antisense oligonucleotide

PAGE:

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

References

  1. Tabatabaei MS, Islam R, Ahmed M (2021) Applications of gold nanoparticles in ELISA, PCR, and immuno-PCR assays: a review. Anal Chim Acta 1143:250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jin H, Sun Z, Sun Y, Gui R (2021) Dual-signal ratiometric platforms: Construction principles and electrochemical biosensing applications at the live cell and small animal levels. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 134:116124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.116124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li F, Zhou Y, Yin H, Ai S (2020) Recent advances on signal amplification strategies in photoelectrochemical sensing of microRNAs. Biosens Bioelectron 166:112476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan I, Vishwakarma SK, Khan AA et al (2018) In vitro hemocompatability evaluation of gold nanoparticles capped with Lactobacillus plantarum derived lipase. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 69:197–205. https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-189117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan I, Nagarjuna R, Ray Dutta J, Ganesan R (2019) Towards single crystalline, highly monodisperse and catalytically active gold nanoparticles capped with probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum derived lipase. Appl Nanosci 9:1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-018-0735-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patil S, Chandrasekaran R (2020) Biogenic nanoparticles: a comprehensive perspective in synthesis, characterization, application and its challenges. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 18:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00081-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Sio L, Caracciolo G, Annesi F et al (2015) Photo-thermal effects in gold nanorods/DNA complexes. Micro Nano Syst Lett 3:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40486-015-0025-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang D, Hua H, Tang H et al (2019) A signal amplification strategy and sensing application using single gold nanoelectrodes. Analyst 144:310–316. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AN01474D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakamura S, Mitomo H, Yonamine Y, Ijiro K (2020) Salt-triggered active plasmonic systems based on the assembly/disassembly of gold nanorods in a DNA brush layer on a solid substrate. Chem Lett 49:749–752. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.200185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ota R, Fukushima Y, Araki Y et al (2020) Ratiometric SERS assays for reliable and automatic quantification of nucleic acids. Chem Lett 50:513–517. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.200798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mobed A, Hasanzadeh M, Aghazadeh M et al (2019) The bioconjugation of DNA with gold nanoparticles towards the spectrophotometric genosensing of pathogenic bacteria. Anal Methods 11:4289–4298. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY01339C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fournier-Wirth C, Coste J (2010) Nanotechnologies for pathogen detection: Future alternatives? Biologicals 38:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khanna S, Padhan P, Das S et al (2018) a simple colorimetric method for naked-eye detection of circulating cell-free DNA using unlabelled gold nanoparticles. ChemistrySelect 3:11541–11551. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201802671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galdamez A, Serrano A, Santana G et al (2019) DNA probe functionalization on different morphologies of ZnO/Au nanowire for bio-sensing applications. Mater Lett 235:250–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao Q, Zheng Y, Liu J et al (2017) Enzyme–antibody dual-film modified gold nanoparticle probe for ultrasensitive detection of alpha fetoprotein. Biologicals 47:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aura AM, D’Agata R, Spoto G (2017) Ultrasensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes genomic DNA by nanoparticle-enhanced surface plasmon resonance imaging. ChemistrySelect 2:7024–7030. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201700779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin W, Maduraiveeran G (2018) Nanomaterial-based environmental sensing platforms using state-of-the-art electroanalytical strategies. J Anal Sci Technol 9:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-018-0150-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee H, Lee SH (2019) Single to three nucleotide polymorphisms assay of miRNA-21 using DNA capped gold nanoparticle-electrostatic force microscopy system. Micro Nano Syst Lett 7:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40486-019-0100-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu B, Liu J (2017) Methods for preparing DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles, a key reagent of bioanalytical chemistry. Anal Methods 9:2633–2643. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7AY00368D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li F, Zhang H, Dever B et al (2013) Thermal stability of DNA functionalized gold nanoparticles. Bioconjug Chem 24:1790–1797. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc300687z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahato K, Nagpal S, Shah MA et al (2019) Gold nanoparticle surface engineering strategies and their applications in biomedicine and diagnostics. 3 Biotech 9:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1577-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhatt N, Huang P-JJ, Dave N, Liu J (2011) Dissociation and degradation of thiol-modified dna on gold nanoparticles in aqueous and organic solvents. Langmuir 27:6132–6137. https://doi.org/10.1021/la200241d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chegel V, Rachkov O, Lopatynskyi A et al (2012) Gold nanoparticles aggregation: drastic effect of cooperative functionalities in a single molecular conjugate. J Phys Chem C 116:2683–2690. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp209251y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi J-H, Kim H, Choi J-H et al (2013) Signal enhancement of silicon nanowire-based biosensor for detection of matrix metalloproteinase-2 using DNA-Au nanoparticle complexes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:12023–12028. https://doi.org/10.1021/am403816x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu M, Yuan C, Tian T et al (2020) Single-step, salt-aging-free, and thiol-free freezing construction of aunp-based bioprobes for advancing crispr-based diagnostics. J Am Chem Soc 142:7506–7513. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c00217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu W, Wang L, Li J et al (2015) Quantitative investigation of the poly-adenine DNA dissociation from the surface of gold nanoparticles. Sci Rep 5:10158. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Storhoff JJ, Elghanian R, Mucic RC et al (1998) One-pot colorimetric differentiation of polynucleotides with single base imperfections using gold nanoparticle probes. J Am Chem Soc 120:1959–1964. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja972332i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cutler JI, Auyeung E, Mirkin CA (2012) Spherical nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc 134:1376–1391. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja209351u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X, Servos MR, Liu J (2012) Instantaneous and quantitative functionalization of gold nanoparticles with thiolated DNA using a pH-assisted and surfactant-free route. J Am Chem Soc 134:7266–7269. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3014055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hao Y, Li Y, Song L, Deng Z (2021) Flash synthesis of spherical nucleic acids with record DNA density. J Am Chem Soc 143:3065–3069. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c00568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Q, Tian Y, Liang Z et al (2021) DNA-mediated au–au dimer-based surface plasmon coupling electrochemiluminescence sensor for BRCA1 gene detection. Anal Chem 93:3308–3314. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun J, Li L, Ge S et al (2021) Dual-mode aptasensor assembled by a WO3/Fe2O3 heterojunction for paper-based colorimetric prediction/photoelectrochemical multicomponent analysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:3645–3652. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c19853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang W, Li X, Tang K et al (2020) A AuNP-capped cage fluorescent biosensor based on controlled-release and cyclic enzymatic amplification for ultrasensitive detection of ATP. J Mater Chem B 8:5945–5951. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB00666A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kasturi S, Eom Y, Torati SR, Kim C (2021) Highly sensitive electrochemical biosensor based on naturally reduced rGO/Au nanocomposite for the detection of miRNA-122 biomarker. J Ind Eng Chem 93:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2020.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohammed AS, Nagarjuna R, Khaja MN et al (2019) Effects of free patchy ends in ssDNA and dsDNA on gold nanoparticles in a colorimetric gene sensor for Hepatitis C virus RNA. Microchim Acta 186:566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3685-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohammed AS, Balapure A, Khaja MN et al (2021) Naked-eye colorimetric detection of HCV RNA mediated by a 5′ UTR-targeted antisense oligonucleotide and plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Analyst 146:1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN02481C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mohammed AS, Balapure A, Khan AA et al (2021) Genotyping simplified: rationally designed antisense oligonucleotide-mediated PCR amplification-free colorimetric sensing of viral RNA in HCV genotypes 1 and 3. Analyst 146:4767–4774. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AN00590A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li H, Jie G (2020) A versatile dendritical amplification photoelectric biosensing platform based on Bi2S3 nanorods and a perylene-based polymer for signal “on” and “off” double detection of DNA. Analyst 145:5524–5531. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN01040E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang G, Li J, He Y et al (2020) Establishment of a universal and sensitive plasmonic biosensor platform based on the hybridization chain reaction (HCR) amplification induced by a triple-helix molecular switch. Analyst 145:3864–3870. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN00249F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chauhan V, Singh MP, Ratho RK (2018) Identification of T cell and B cell epitopes against Indian HCV-genotype-3a for vaccine development—an in silico analysis. Biologicals 53:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saad F, Gadallah M, Daif A et al (2021) Heparanase (HPSE) gene polymorphism (rs12503843) contributes as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): a pilot study among Egyptian patients. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00106-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Turkevich J, Stevenson PC, Hillier J (1951) A study of the nucleation and growth processes in the synthesis of colloidal gold. Discuss Faraday Soc 11:55–75. https://doi.org/10.1039/DF9511100055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanromán-Iglesias M, Lawrie CH, Schäfer T et al (2016) Sensitivity limit of nanoparticle biosensors in the discrimination of single nucleotide polymorphism. ACS Sensors 1:1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.6b00393

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank BITS-Pilani, Hyderabad campus for providing all the infrastructural facilities to accomplish this research work.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HSP: Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation. PAM: Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation. NSSB: Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation. AB: Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation. RG: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. JRD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ramakrishnan Ganesan or Jayati Ray Dutta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prakash, H.S., Maroju, P.A., Boppudi, N.S.S. et al. Influence of citrate buffer and flash heating in enhancing the sensitivity of ratiometric genosensing of Hepatitis C virus using plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Micro and Nano Syst Lett 9, 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40486-021-00134-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40486-021-00134-3

Keywords