Hierarchical micro/nano structures for super-hydrophobic surfaces and super-lyophobic surface against liquid metal
© Yoon et al.; licensee Springer 2014
Received: 13 November 2013
Accepted: 27 May 2014
Published: 3 September 2014
Non-wetting super-hydrophobic or super-lyophobic surfaces are of great interest in a variety of applications. Natural water repelling surfaces show micro-/nano- combined hierarchical structure which shows extremely low wettability and self-cleaning characteristics. Inspired by such natural wonders, there have been tremendous efforts to create artificial non-wetting super-hydrophobic or super-lyophobic surfaces. In this paper, recent progress in artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces based on hierarchical micro-/nano- dual-scale structure is reviewed. In addition, application of hierarchical micro-/nano- dual-scale structure as super-lyophobic surfaces against gallium-based liquid metal alloy is also reviewed.
KeywordsSuper-hydrophobic Super-lyophobic Lotus effect Self-cleaning Hierarchical structure Liquid metal Galinstan®
Natural water repelling surfaces, such as lotus leaves, butterfly wings, and shark scales exhibit high water contact angle in excess of approximately 150° –. Surfaces with water contact angles greater than 150° is called super-hydrophobic. It has been reported that such super-hydrophobicity stems from a combination of hierarchical micro-/nano-scale surface texturing and surface chemical composition . Combination of micro- and nano-scale structure is crucial as water droplet on these hierarchical structures may touch on the apex of the nano-scale structures without fully sitting on the surface because air pockets fill in the vicinity of nano-scale structures beneath the droplet resulting in low contact area of water droplet, high contact angle, low contact hysteresis, and low adhesive force .
Mimicking such natural wonders and creating artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces on various solid substrates has been of great interest over the past few decades and there have been considerable amount of reported literatures on the topic. Although a variety of materials and technologies were studied to create artificial hierarchical micro- /nano-scale surface textures for super-hydrophobicity, many of the studies are based on materials that are solid and optically opaque in visible wavelengths. Super-hydrophobic surfaces with high optical transmission in visible wavelengths have considerable potential to be used in a variety of self-cleaning surface applications such as optical component, lens, displays, electronic equipment, automobile glass, anti-fog consumer glass, solar panels, among others. In order to maintain high optical transparency, it is critical that structural roughness on the artificial lotus effect surface should be much smaller than the wavelength of transmitted light .
Along with super-hydrophobic surfaces, there have been great interests in creating anti-wetting surfaces against oils  as well as microfluidic platforms for manipulating gallium-based non-toxic liquid metals . With the phenomenal advance of artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces, hierarchical micro-/nano-scale surfaces may provide starting platforms for study on creating super-oleophobic surfaces and super-lyophobic surfaces against liquid metals.
This review discusses recent research progress on hierarchical micro-/nano-scale surfaces as artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces as well as super-lyophobic surfaces against gallium-based liquid metal alloys.
Definition of lyophobic/lyophilic
The definition of ‘lyophobic/lyophilic’ is the physical property of a molecule that is repelled from or attracted to a mass of liquid. Therefore, the ‘lyophobic or lyophilic’ should be used with indication of target liquid except hydrophobic/hydrophilic or oleophobic/oleophilic that implies target liquid is water or oil, respectively. The ‘lyophobic/lyophilic’ is the superordinate concept to hydrophobic/hydrophilic.
Generally, when the contact angle is smaller than 90°, the solid surface is considered to be ‘lyophilic’ which means wetting of liquid on the surface is favorable. When the contact angle is larger than 90°, the solid surface is considered ‘lyophobic’ which indicates the liquid will minimize its contact on the surface and form a compact liquid droplet. When the contact angle is greater than 150°, the solid surface is considered to be ‘super-lyophobic’. And when the contact angle is almost 0°, the surface is considered to be ‘super-lyophilic’ .
Contact angle hysteresis
Along with static contact angle, in order to quantify the ‘dynamic’ wetting property of liquid on a solid surface (when the droplet is in the transitional motion), ‘dynamic’ contact angle is an important parameter. When a droplet is placed on an inclined surface, the droplet can experience gravitational force so that the shape of the droplet becomes asymmetric; on the downhill side, the droplet advances but on the uphill side, the droplet recedes. Therefore, the contact angle of the droplet on the downhill side is an advancing contact angle and that of the droplet on the uphill side is a receding contact angle. The difference between the advancing angle and the receding angle is called contact angle hysteresis. Due to the difference of advancing and receding contact angles, the droplet can stick to the surface against gravitational force. Additionally, the dynamic contact angle can be measured by changing the volume of liquid. The volume of liquid is increased or decreased until the droplet has a maximum or minimum contact angle without changing the surface area between the liquid and the solid substrate. The maximum and minimum contact angles are called the advancing and receding contact angle, respectively, and the advancing and receding contact angles are obtained from a series of images from a recorded video just before the contact line changes. When the advancing and receding contact angles of liquid on a solid substrate are close each other, which means the lower contact angle hysteresis, it indicates the substrate is lyophobic to the liquid .
Super-hydrophobic surfaces in nature
Artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces
Understanding reasons for the super-hydrophobicity in various plant surfaces and insect wings among others in nature has allowed extensive researches in artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces using various materials. A surface with combined characteristics of high water contact angles (>150°) with low sliding angles (tilted angle which allows free rolling of water droplets on a surface) typically smaller than 10° is commonly known as self-cleaning surfaces. One of the motivations for the popularity in the research community on the super-hydrophobic surfaces is because of potential manufacturing of artificial self-cleaning surfaces. Inspired by natural super-hydrophobic surfaces, a wide variety of fabrication processes such as deep reactive ion etch (DRIE) process ,, electrodeposition –, self-assembly , plasma treatment ,, chemical vapor deposition ,,, and layer-by layer deposition  have been studied to fabricate artificial biomimetic super-hydrophobic hierarchical micro-/nano-scale structures.
Among various artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces, optically transparent super-hydrophobic surfaces have great potential to be used in a variety of self-cleaning surface applications such as the prevention of the adhesion of dust and snow to window glasses, traffic indicators, goggles, and solar panels, etc. Optically transparent coatings, self-cleaning surfaces and anti-reflective coatings are active research topics targeted for the coating industry, consumer glass, optical component/lens manufactures, displays/electronic equipment and aerospace. In order to make surfaces transparent to certain range of wavelengths of light, it is essential that the surface roughness of the artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces should be much smaller than the wavelength of light . This provides one of the key design criteria for the optically transparent self-cleaning surfaces which should have nano-scale roughness much smaller than wavelength of visible light (400 ~ 700 nm) while having micro-scale roughness for enhanced air-trapping.
Among various hierarchically textured super-hydrophobic surfaces, in order to introduce various materials and methods to fabricate them, we have studied four different super-hydrophobic surfaces: silica nanoparticles, carbon nanotube (CNT), PDMS, and SU-8 based super-hydrophobic surfaces.
Silica nanoparticles based super-hydrophobic thin film
Carbon nanotube based super-hydrophobic thin film
SU-8 based super-hydrophobic thin film
SU-8, one of the most popular materials used in the field of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), shows a water contact angle of 73.1 ± 2.8° and surface energy of 45.5 ± 0.3 mJ/m2. Although the material itself does not show hydrophobicity, SU-8 is one of the great materials to create super-hydrophobic thin film because it is readily fabricated in high aspect ratio microstructures to have roughened surface which can be tuned its wetting property. In order to realize the property, it is essential to combine artificial nano-scale textures with the micro-patterned SU-8, forming hierarchical micro-/nano-scale structured surface. Recently, there have been a few efforts to create artificial super-hydrophobic thin film using SU-8 as surveyed below.
Hong et al. prepared a direct mixture of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) nanoparticles into SU-8, spin-coated the PTFE-SU-8 nano-composite on transparent substrates such as glass and polymers, and photo defined micro-scale patterns with a minimum feature size of 50 μm . This film showed water contact angle of 150°, which is significant improvement in hydrophobicity from normally not so hydrophobic SU-8 flat surface. This is attributed to the effect of formation of hierarchical roughness on the surface as well as reduction of effective surface energy of the substrate. Although this result seemed good, optical transparency of this PTFE-SU-8 nano-composite film was only 31%, prohibitively low in practical optical transparency applications. They also reported an alternative method in which the PTFE nanoparticles were spray coated and thermally immobilized onto the exposed SU-8 matrix. During the SU-8 developing process, PTFE nanoparticles sprayed onto the unexposed SU-8 layer were also removed. The PTFE-SU-8 film prepared by this alternative method showed a water contact angle of 165° ~ 167° and an optical transparency up to 80%.
Marquez-Velasco et al. reported super-hydrophobic surfaces fabricated in SU-8 by having micro- and nano-scale topography . In this work, SU-8 was patterned to have low aspect ratio cylindrical and square pillars with thickness of 45 μm and 75 μm. Then, the SU-8 pillars were O2 plasma treated to roughen the SU-8 pillar surface to have 20 nm (30 sec. etch) or 2 μm (5 min. etch) sub-pillars formed on the SU-8. It was shown that 2 μm sub-pillars were too tall and readily clung together to lose its purpose (dual-scale topography). However, dual-scale topography SU-8 formed by 20 nm sub-pillars clearly showed super-hydrophobicity (contact angles > 157°, contact angle hysteresis as low as 5º). Although there was a potential, optical transparency of the dual-scale topography of this SU-8 film was not reported.
PDMS based super-hydrophobic thin film
Although SU-8-based artificial super-hydrophobic thin films overall showed excellent hydrophobicity, the optical transparency in visible wavelengths turned out to be less than 80%. For practical optically transparent self-cleaning thin film applications, it is highly desirable to have greater than 80% optical transparency. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was one of the popular materials studied by various groups for optically transparent artificial self-cleaning thin film applications. The popularity for the PDMS was due to many favorable inherent material properties. Some of the key material properties of the PDMS for the optically transparent super-hydrophobic thin film applications are its low surface energy of 19.8 mJ/cm2, high optical transparency throughout the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths , and extremely low Young’s modulus (<4 MPa)  which makes the PDMS ideal material for flexible self-cleaning super-hydrophobic thin film application to conform to arbitrary shaped non-planar surfaces. It is also well-known for reliably maintaining dimensions in the replicated inverse images of a master mold using soft lithography .
Super-lyophobic surfaces against liquid metals
Liquid metal is the metal in liquid phase at room temperature. As it has liquid property which is continuously deformable as well as metallic property such as high thermal and electrical conductivity, it can be applied to various applications such as radio frequency (RF) MEMS switch , electro-wetting on dielectrics (EWOD) ,, tunable and flexible antennas , frequency selective surfaces (FSS) , and heat transfer  among others. For those various applications, as the surface oxidation of liquid metal drastically increases the wettability, the super-lyophobic surface against liquid metal has been of interest.
Super-lyophobic surfaces against mercury
The most well-known liquid metal is mercury. The surface tension and contact angle of various substrates against mercury have been studied from 1920s. The reported surface tension of mercury is in the range of 400 ~ 516 mN/m  in air environment at room temperature. The typically acceptable value of surface tension is ~ 480 mN/m  which is much greater than that of water (72.9 mN/m). Therefore, the contact angle of mercury is much higher than that of water on the same solid substrate based on Young’s equation .
As the contact angle study was investigated without development of micromachining technology, most studied substrates were simply flat surface but treated with different chemicals such as low surface energy material like Teflon (surface energy ~ 18.5 mN/m). Yarnold reported that the advancing and receding contact angle of mercury on the steel which was washed in ether were 165° and 130°, respectively . Gray also reported dynamic contact angle of mercury on low-energy solid substrates such as polyethylene, paraffin wax, and PTFE. The highest advancing angle of 151.7° was obtained on the PTFE substrate and the lowest contact angle hysteresis of ~ 0.2° was achieved on the paraffin wax with pure mercury by acid treatment . Ellison et al. studied the dynamic contact angles of mercury on various substrates (tungsten, stainless steel, nickel, quartz, glass, and Teflon) under varying temperatures in the range of 25 ~ 150°C . The highest advancing contact angle of 157° was measured on the Teflon as the Teflon is ‘low surface energy’ substrate compared with other ‘high surface energy’ substrates. In addition, most substrates showed that contact angle hystereses were in the range of 0° ~ 3° with pure cleaned mercury which means that the mercury can be easily roll off from the surface. The temperature effect for surface tension of mercury was negligible. Awasthi et al. reported the static contact angle of mercury on graphite as 152.5 ± 2° by applying ‘spot technique’ which can be also used for high temperature measurement, as the contact angle of liquid metal at high temperature is useful for practical applications such as metal casting, welding, and brazing .
In particular, the contact angle of mercury on the dielectric substrate was an important parameter for EWOD applications ,. Shen et al. reported that the contact angle of line patterns with various contact ratio (line width per pitch) for mercury using photolithography . As the contact ratio decreases from 1 to 0.3, the contact angle increases from 142° to 158°. Latorre et al. reported that the contact angle of mercury on oxidized silicon wafer was 137° with a standard deviation of 8° .
Super-lyophobic surfaces against gallium-based liquid metal alloys
Non-toxic gallium-based liquid metal have been of interest lately as it has various favorable properties such as higher boiling point, higher thermal and electrical conductivity against mercury . The gallium-based binary (eutectic GaIn alloy ) and ternary alloy (e.g., Galinstan® ) have been studied for various applications. However, it has a challenging problem which is the fact that the surface of gallium-based liquid metal alloy is instantly oxidized in air and wets almost any surfaces . It is a critical issue to have non-wetting super-lyophobic surface against gallium-based liquid metal but there was very limited report on super-lyophobic surface for gallium-based liquid metal alloys, probably due to the strong wettability of the gallium-based alloys.
In order to prevent of wetting, Liu et al. measured, in the below 1 ppm oxygen environment, the advancing and receding contact angle of pure Galinstan® on the various substrates such as tungsten, silicon nitride, glass, parylene, Teflon®, phlogopite, and muscovite. It was found that Galinstan® was non-wettable on all surfaces under the condition. Among them, the muscovite showed the highest advancing of 163.6° and receding contact angle of 148.1°, resulting in the smallest contact angle hysteresis of 15.5°, as the substrate has higher surface roughness compared to others .
Oxide-free gallium-based liquid metal alloys are crucial for certain applications like micro switches. However, in other applications such as micro-cooling and FSS, maintaining true liquid phase of gallium-based liquid metal alloy is not necessary. Recently, we measured static contact angle of oxidized Galinstan® on a glass, Cytop, and Teflon, in air environment . Among them, Teflon substrate shows highest contact angle of 140.3°. However, the contact angle of the Galinstan® droplet was increased to be 152.5° by removing oxide layer using hydrochloric acid vapor.
Recent progress on the hierarchical micro-/nano-scale structures for the artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces and super-lyophobic surfaces against gallium-based liquid metal alloys are reviewed. As one of the key contributing factors for the natural super-hydrophobic surfaces is dual micro-/nano-scale surfaces, a wide variety of materials and numerous fabrication approaches were studied. Of those, optically transparent artificial super-hydrophobic surfaces are of great interest in many practical self-cleaning surface applications. Both SU-8 and PDMS-based super-hydrophobic self-cleaning surfaces have been demonstrated with promising characteristics. As demonstrated by a few groups, it is in its utmost importance to realize super-hydrophobic and super-oleophobic surfaces together to be used in real applications.
Gallium-based liquid metal alloys are one of the very interesting materials and have great potential to be utilized in a wide variety of novel applications due to their unique conductive characteristic along with constantly deformable liquid characteristic. Due to its oxidation problem, it is essential to have super-lyophobic surface against the oxidized gallium-based liquid metal. Recently hierarchical micro-/nano-scale structures have been applied to super-lyophobicity surfaces against gallium-based liquid metals. It is expected that, in the next few years, numerous unexplored potential of the liquid metal-based devices will be studied based on recent progress of the super-lyophobic surfaces.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Dong-Weon Lee of Chonnam National University and Dr. Wonjae Choi of The University of Texas at Dallas for invaluable technical/scientific discussions and UTD clean room staff for their support on device fabrication work. The authors also would like to thank Republic of Korea (ROK) Army for financial support.
- Smith J, Jones M Jr, Houghton L: Future of health insurance. N Engl J Med 1999, 965: 325–329.Google Scholar
- Byun D, Hong J, Saputra KJ, Lee Y, Park H, Byun B, Lukes J: Wetting characteristics of insect wing surfaces. J Bionic Eng 2009, 6: 63–70. 10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60092-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng L, Li S, Li Y, Li H, Zhang L, Zhai J, Song Y, Liu B, Jiang L, Zhu D: Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv Materials 2002, 14: 1857–1860. 10.1002/adma.200290020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koch K, Barthlott W: Superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic plant surfaces: an inspiration for biomimetic materials. Phil Trans Royal Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 2009, 367: 1487–1509. 10.1098/rsta.2009.0022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhushan B, Jung Y: Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces. J Phys: Cond Matter 2008, 20: 225010.Google Scholar
- Nakajima A, Fujishima A, Hashimoto K, Watanabe T: Preparation of transparent superhydrophobic boehmite and silica films by sublimation of aluminum acetylacetonate. Adv Materials 1999, 11: 1365–1368. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199911)11:16<1365::AID-ADMA1365>3.0.CO;2-FView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoefnagels H, Wu D, With G, Ming W: Biomimetic superhydrophobic and highly oleophobic cottont textiles. Langmuir 2007, 23: 13158–13163. 10.1021/la702174xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dickey M, Chiechi R, Larsen R, Weiss E, Weitz D, Whitesides G: Eutectic gallium-indium (EGaIn): a liquid metal alloy for the formation of stable structures in microchannels at room temperature. Adv Func Materials 2008, 18: 1097–1104. 10.1002/adfm.200701216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Young T: An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil Trans Royal Soc London 1805, 95: 65–87. 10.1098/rstl.1805.0005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wenzel R: Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 1936, 28: 988–994. 10.1021/ie50320a024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baxter S, Cassie A: 8-The water repellency of fabrics and a new water repellecncy test. J Textile Ins Trans 1945, 36: T67-T90. 10.1080/19447024508659707View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi W, Tuteja A, Mabry J, Cohen R, McKinley G: A modified Cassie–Baxter relationship to explain contact angle hysteresis and anisotropy on non-wetting textured surfaces. J Colloid Int Sci 2009, 339: 208–216. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.07.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hozumi A, McCarthy T: Ultralyophobic oxidized aluminum surfaces exhibiting negligible contact angle hysteresis. Langmuir 2009, 26: 2567–2573. 10.1021/la9028518View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barthlott W, Neinhuis C: Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 1997, 202: 1–8. 10.1007/s004250050096View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burton Z, Bhushan B: Surface characterization and adhesion and friction properties of hydrophobic leaf surfaces. Ultramicroscopy 2006, 106: 709–719. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.10.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhushan B, Jung Y, Koch K: Micro-, nano- and hierarchical structures for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion. Phil Trans Royal Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2009, 367: 1631–1672. 10.1098/rsta.2009.0014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo Z, Liu W: Biomimic from the superhydrophobic plant leaves in nature: binary structure and unitary structure. Plant Sci 2007, 172: 1103–1112. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.03.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cha T, Yi J, Moon M, Lee K, Kim H: Nanoscale patterning of microtextured surfaces to control superhydrophobic robustness. Langmuir 2010, 26: 8319–8326. 10.1021/la9047402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang C, Lee S, Jung I, Jung P, Hwang S, Ko J: The fabrication of patternable silicon nanotips using deep reactive ion etching. J Micromech Microeng 2008, 18: 075007. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/7/075007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roach P, Shirtcliffe N, Newton M: Progess in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter 2008, 4: 224–240. 10.1039/b712575pView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cortese B, D’Amone S, Manca M, Viola I, Cingolani R, Gigli G: Superhydrophobicity due to the hierarchical scale roughness of PDMS surfaces. Langmuir 2008, 24: 2712–2718. 10.1021/la702764xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang M, Raghunathan N, Ziaie B: A nonlithographic top-down electrochemical approach for creating hierarchical (micro − nano) superhydrophobic silicon surfaces. Langmuir 2007, 23: 2300–2303. 10.1021/la063230lView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhushan B, Jung Y, Niemietz A, Koch K: Lotus-like biomimetic hierarchical structures developed by the self-assembly of tubular plant waxes. Langmuir 2009, 25: 1659–1666. 10.1021/la802491kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ming W, Wu D, Benthem R, With G: Superhydrophobic films from raspberry-like particles. Nano Lett 2005, 5: 2298–2301. 10.1021/nl0517363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bok H, Kim S, Yoo S, Kim S, Park S: Synthesis of perpendicular nanorod arrays with hierarchical architecture and water slipping superhydrophobic properties. Langmuir 2008, 24: 4168–4173. 10.1021/la7026972View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Wang X, Song Y, Liu Y, Li Q, Jiang L, Zhu D: Super-amphiphobic aligned carbon nanotube films. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 40: 1743–1746.Google Scholar
- Lin J, Chu C, Chiang M, Tsai W: Manipulating assemblies of high-aspect-ratio clays and fatty amine salts to form surfaces exhibiting a lotus effect. Adv Materials 2006, 18: 3248–3252. 10.1002/adma.200600948View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E: Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Int Sci 1968, 26: 62–69. 10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qian Z, Zhang Z, Song L, Liu H: A novel approach to raspberry-like particles for superhydrophobic materials. J Materials Chem 2009, 19: 1297–1304. 10.1039/b810808kView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lau K, Bico J, Teo K, Chhowalla M, Amaratunga G, Milne W, McKinley G, Gleason K: Superhydrophobic carbon nanotube forests. Nano Lett 2003, 3: 1701–1705. 10.1021/nl034704tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jung Y, Bhushan B: Mechanically durable carbon nanotube − composite hierarchical structures with superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, and low-drag. ACS Nano 2009, 3: 4155–4163. 10.1021/nn901509rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Zhou W, Chan-Park M, Conner S: Argon plasma modification of SU-8 for very high aspect ratio and dense copper electroforming. J Electrochem Soc 2005, 152: C716-C721. 10.1149/1.2034519View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong L, Pan T: Photopatternable superhydrophobic nanocomposites for microfabrication. J Microelectromech Sys 2010, 19: 246–253. 10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2041189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marquez-Velasco J, Vlachopoulou M, Tserepi A, Gogolides E: Stable superhydrophobic surfaces induced by dual-scale topography on SU-8. Microelectronic Eng 2010, 87: 782–785. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.11.113View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoon Y, Lee D, Lee J: Surface modified nano-patterned SU-8 pillar array optically transparent super-hydrophobic thin film. J Micromech Microeng 2012, 22: 035012. 10.1088/0960-1317/22/3/035012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim K, Park D, Lu H, Che W, Kim K, Lee J, Ahn C: A tapered hollow metallic microneedle array using backside exposure of SU-8. J Micromech Microeng 2004, 14: 597. 10.1088/0960-1317/14/4/021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hur S, Khang D, Kocabas C, Rogers J: Nanotransfer printing by use of noncovalent surface forces: applications to thin-film transistors that use single-walled carbon nanotube networks and semiconducting polymers. Appl Phys Lett 2004, 85: 5730–5732. 10.1063/1.1829774View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jo B, Lerberghe L, Motsegood K, Beebe D: Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer. J Microelectromech Sys 2000, 9: 76–81. 10.1109/84.825780View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fuard D, Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Decossas S, Tracqui P, Schiavone P: Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility. Microelectronic Eng 2008, 85: 1289–1293. 10.1016/j.mee.2008.02.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim K, Park S, Lee J, Manohara H, Desta Y, Murphy M, Ahn C: Rapid replication of polymeric and metallic high aspect ratio microstructures using PDMS and LIGA technology. Microsyst Tech 2002, 9: 5–10. 10.1007/s00542-002-0194-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Kim D, Im M, Lee J, Yoon J, Choi Y: Lock-and-key geometry effect of patterned surfaces: wettability and switching of adhesive force. Small 2009, 5: 90–94. 10.1002/smll.200800649View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee J, Choi W, Lee K, Yoon J: A simple and effective fabrication method for various 3D microstructures: backside 3D diffuser lithography. J Micromech Microeng 2008, 18: 125015. 10.1088/0960-1317/18/12/125015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Im M, Im H, Lee J, Yoon J, Choi Y: A robust superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surface with inverse-trapezoidal microstructures on a large transparent flexible substrate. Soft Matter 2010, 6: 1401–1404. 10.1039/b925970hView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoon Y, Lee D, Ahn J, Sohn J, Lee J: One-step fabrication of optically transparent polydimethylsiloxane artificial lotus leaf film using under-exposed under-baked photoresist mold. In Proc. IEEE 25th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. IEEE MEMS Conference, Paris, France; 2012:301–304.Google Scholar
- Yoon Y, Lee D, Lee J: Fabrication of optically transparent PDMS artificial lotus leaf film using underexposed and underbaked photoresist mold. J Microelectromech Sys 2013, 22: 1073–1080. 10.1109/JMEMS.2013.2264729View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sen P, Kim C: Microscale liquid-metal switches : a review. Trans Ind Elect 2009, 56: 1314–1330. 10.1109/TIE.2008.2006954View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shen W, Kim J, Kim C: Controlling the adhesion force for electrostatic actuation of microscale mercury drop by physical surface modification. In Proc. IEEE 15th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. IEEE MEMS Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA; 2002:52–55.Google Scholar
- Latorre L, Kim J, Lee J, Guzman P, Lee H, Nouet P, Kim C: Electrostatic actuation of microscale liquid-metal droplets. J Microelectromech Sys 2002, 11: 302–308. 10.1109/JMEMS.2002.800934View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kubo M, Li X, Kim C, Hashimoto M, Wiley B, Ham D, Whitesides G: Stretchable microfluidic radiofrequency antennas. Adv Materials 2010, 22: 2749–2752. 10.1002/adma.200904201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meng L, Bin Y, Behdad N: Liquid-tunable frequency selective surfaces. Microwave Wireless Comp Lett 2010, 20: 423–425. 10.1109/LMWC.2010.2049257View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma K, Liu J: Heat-driven liquid metal cooling device for the thermal management of a computer chip. J Phys D Appl Phys 2007, 40: 4722. 10.1088/0022-3727/40/15/055View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nicholas M, Joyner P, Tessem B, Olson M: The effect of various gases and vapors on the surface tension of mercury. J Phys Chem 1961, 65: 1373–1375. 10.1021/j100826a023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lide D: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 2007.Google Scholar
- Yarnold G: The hysteresis of the angle of contact of mercury. Proc Phys Soc 1946, 58: 120. 10.1088/0959-5309/58/1/312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gray V: Contact angles of mercury on low-energy solids. Nature 1966, 209: 608–609. 10.1038/209608b0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellison A, Klemm R, Schwartz A, Grubb L, Petrash D: Contact angles of mercury on various surfaces and the effect of temperature. J Chem Eng Data 1967, 12: 607–609. 10.1021/je60035a037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Awasthi A, Bhatt Y, Garg S: Measurement of contact angle in systems involving liquid metals. Meas Sci Tech 1996, 7: 753. 10.1088/0957-0233/7/5/005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Escobar J, Garza C, Alonso J, Castillo R: Super-mercuryphobic and hydrophobic diamond surfaces with hierarchical structures: vanishment of the contact angle hysteresis with mercury. Appl Surf Sci 2013, 273: 692–701. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu T, Sen P, Kim C: Characterization of nontoxic liquid-metal alloy Galinstan for applications in microdevices. J Microelectromech Sys 2012, 21: 443–450. 10.1109/JMEMS.2011.2174421View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scharmann F, Cherkashinin G, Breternitz V, Knedlik C, Hartung G, Weber T, Schaefer J: Viscosity effect on GaInSn studied by XPS. Surf Int Anal 2004, 36: 981–985. 10.1002/sia.1817View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim D, Thissen P, Viner G, Lee D, Choi W, Chabal Y, Lee J: Recovery of nonwetting characteristics by surface modification of gallium-based liquid metal droplets using hydrochloric acid vapor. ACS Appl Materials Int 2013, 5: 179–185. 10.1021/am302357tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim D, Lee D, Choi W, Lee J: A super-lyophobic PDMS micro-tunnel as a novel microfluidic platform for oxidized Galinstan®. In Proc. IEEE 25th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. IEEE, Paris, France; 2012:1005–1008.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.